Alright, so the EA FC 26 top 50 player leaks are starting to drop, and I've seen some chatter about Rodri still being a 90-rated player. My initial reaction? Are you kidding me, EA? After the season(s) he's had, the absolute bedrock he is for Manchester City, I genuinely expected a significant bump. This feels like a classic EA misstep, overlooking the true workhorse and opting for flashier players. For those looking to build their dream team early, securing FC 26 Coins will be crucial, but the value of a 90-rated Rodri card is now a real discussion point.
Let's be real here for a second. Rodri has been arguably the best defensive midfielder in the world for the past two years, if not longer. He scores crucial goals, dictates the tempo, breaks up play effortlessly, and rarely puts a foot wrong. He's the fulcrum around which City's dominance revolves. We've seen him step up in big games, including a Champions League final-winning goal. How does that not warrant at least a 91 or even a 92?
When you look at other top midfielders who might be getting higher ratings, it just makes the 90 seem even more baffling. Is it because his play isn't as 'traditionally' exciting or marketable as a flashy winger or a prolific striker? It feels like EA often prioritizes attacking stats and dribbling over the nuanced, game-controlling abilities of a player like Rodri.
This kind of rating oversight has real implications for Ultimate Team. A 90-rated Rodri, while still good, might not feel 'elite' enough compared to other options available early on, especially if his in-game stats don't reflect his real-world dominance. Imagine trying to integrate him into a meta squad when there might be faster, more agile alternatives with better passing or shooting, even if they aren't as defensively sound.
It makes me wonder about their scouting and rating process. Are they watching the games? Are they consulting actual football experts, or just looking at highlight reels and general media buzz? This isn't just a slight to Rodri; it's a slight to the intelligence of the player base who clearly see his immense value.
I'm genuinely curious to hear what others think. Am I overreacting, or is this a clear case of EA simply not understanding the modern game and the importance of a true defensive lynchpin? What rating do you think he deserves based on his recent performances?
Ultimately, a proper rating would reflect his status as one of the best in his position globally. This 90 feels like an oversight that could easily be fixed. Maybe a strong start to the season will force their hand for an in-form or upgrade, but for launch, it's just not right. If you're looking to gear up for the new game, remember you'll need a solid stash of buy FC 26 Coins to snag your favorite players, even if their ratings are questionable.
u4gm Rodri stays 90 overall in EA FC 26 top players
Moderator: Admins & Moderators